A blog about my interests, mainly the history of fighting games. I also talk about animation, comic books, car culture, and art. Co-host of the Pink Monorail Podcast. Contributor to MiceChat, and Jim Hill Media. Former blogger on the old 1UP community site, and Capcom-Unity as well.
Friday, October 18, 2024
Generations of Hulk creators, part 3...
In the previous blog I mentioned that the Hulk was a monster, very much similar to Frankenstein’s creation. He was large, twisted, and grotesque in proportions. The character worked exceptionally well in horror stories as both the monster, and hero. An artist like Bernie Wrightson was a perfect choice to draw some of the Incredible Hulk issues, and stand-alone stories. I also mentioned that some comic book artists made the mistake of presenting the Hulk with a large bodybuilder physique. Where he had well defined muscles, and low body fat. I argued that these types of builds worked on a surface level to represent strength, but that wasn’t necessarily the best way to do it. There was an artist that had worked for DC, and Marvel that demonstrated that it was possible to render power, without making the characters swollen bodybuilders.
Labels:
art,
dale keown,
dc,
favorite artists,
hulk,
illustrator,
image comics,
joe fixit,
john byrne,
marvel,
pantheon,
peter david,
professor hulk,
redraw,
superman,
the pitt
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Peter David’s Hulk run was probably the best ever in all of comics! All the top artists seemed to be clamoring to draw for it back in the 90’s. I loved Keown’s Hulk stuff but wasn’t a fan of Pitt (both art and story.)
ReplyDeleteIt's a shame a lot of comic book readers haven't gotten a chance to see what happens when an amazing writer does their homework, and elevates an already iconic character.
Delete